← Search

Jason Liner

Raleigh, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
308 matches · 225W–83L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jason Liner to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history308 matches
L
2026-09-01 · Je.Monaghen18C · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jeffrey Monaghen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-08-30 · Je.Monaghen18C · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Roger Hutchinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-30 · Je.Monaghen18C · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jeremy Saunders
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-16 · Je.Monaghen18C · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Tom McCormack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-08-09 · Je.Monaghen18C · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Tom McCormack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-05 · Ja.Liner40M · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Diane Allen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-03 · Ja.Liner18M · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melissa Liner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-30 · Je.Monaghen18T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Arra
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-07-30 · Je.Monaghen18T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeffrey Monaghen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-29 · Ja.Liner40M · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Bricker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-27 · Ja.Liner18M · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melissa Liner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-26 · Jo.Hoomani40T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Arra
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams49 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
72.4%
89W–34L · 60.8% of games
4.5
44.4%
4W–5L · 45.1% of games
7.5
80.5%
33W–8L · 61.1% of games
8.5
41.2%
7W–10L · 48.7% of games
4.0mixed
79.2%
38W–10L · 63.4% of games
8.0mixed
86.4%
38W–6L · 65.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 56% of the time
#1 Doubles
56%
173 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
71 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
32 matches
#1 Singles
7%
20 matches
#2 Singles
3%
10 matches
#3 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams