← Search

David Dare

Raleigh, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
51 matches · 34W–17L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add David Dare to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history51 matches
W
2026-08-30 · Ma.Gregson18C7.5 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Aubry Carmody
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-08-23 · Ma.Gregson18C7.5 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mark Scherr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-08-19 · Jo.Markham40C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sterling Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
Wendy Jackson / Wes Snead
2026-08-05 · Ra.Brown18M · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alicia Dare mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-23 · Ad.Whitesell18T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chris Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-11 · Ca.Pena18S · #3 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
W
2026-06-28 · Ad.Whitesell40S · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-22 · Ra.Brown18M · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alicia Dare mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-06-21 · Ad.Whitesell40S · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-06-18 · Ad.Whitesell18T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Gorman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-04-29 · Ry.Lindsay40A · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-26 · An.Schrader18A · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
86.7%
13W–2L · 64.4% of games
4.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 43.4% of games
7.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 47.2% of games
8.5
75%
3W–1L · 55.8% of games
3.5mixed
80%
4W–1L · 62.8% of games
4.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 61.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
21 matches
#1 Singles
20%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
9 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match
#3 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova