← Search

Vincent Aurentz

Chapel Hill, NC
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
89 matches · 44W–45L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Vincent Aurentz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history89 matches
L
2026-09-09 · DBaddour.40C-CHCC · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Wes Talman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-20 · DBaddour.40C-CHCC · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Christian Shelby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-03 · RHutchins.40C-CHCC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Toland Barfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
N/A
2026-07-30 · RHutchins-CHCC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Crissy Haley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-15 · VAurentz-CHCC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Niels Lameijer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-01 · VAurentz-CHCC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Niels Lameijer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-04 · RHutchins-CHCC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Kent mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-27 · VAurentz-CHCC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Jenkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-02 · JTillman-CHCC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeff Tillman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-04-18 · JTillman-CHCC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Jenkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-04-14 · DBaddour-CHCC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brice Englert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-04-11 · JTillman-CHCC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Frank Sutton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
100%
5W–0L · 78.4% of games
4.0
47.1%
24W–27L · 46.9% of games
7.5
50%
12W–12L · 45.8% of games
8.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 48% of the time
#3 Doubles
48%
43 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
31 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
14 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe