← Search

Mike Meske

Durham, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
44 matches · 28W–16L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Mike Meske to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history44 matches
W
2026-09-10 · JByrd-NCCU · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jermaine Byrd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-09 · JByrd-NCCU · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Patrick Shields
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-09-03 · JByrd-NCCU · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jermaine Byrd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-08-30 · JByrd.7.5C-DUR · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Casey Collins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
W
Juan Andrade / Michael Young
2026-08-23 · JByrd.7.5C-DUR · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Matthew Curry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-08-20 · JByrd-NCCU · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Patrick Shields
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-08-09 · JByrd.7.5C-DUR · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Devohn Vines
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-07-12 · JByrd2-DUR · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alex Piasecki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-28 · JByrd2-DUR · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Benjamin Katz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-21 · JByrd2-DUR · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brett Compton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-11 · JByrd-DUR · #3 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-06-07 · JByrd2-DUR · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jared Ingram
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
68%
17W–8L · 60.3% of games
4.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
54.5%
6W–5L · 50.9% of games
8.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 53.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
34%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
7 matches
#3 Singles
7%
3 matches
#2 Singles
5%
2 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova