← Search

Crissy Haley

Chapel Hill, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
56 matches · 41W–15L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Crissy Haley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history56 matches
W
2026-09-11 · CBaddour.18C-CHCC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Betsey Duthe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-09 · CBaddour-CHCC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Megan Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
N/A
2026-07-30 · RHutchins-CHCC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vincent Aurentz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-30 · RHutchins-CHCC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Hutchins mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-07-19 · CBaddour-CHCC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carey Baddour
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-17 · CBaddour-CHCC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Haley Kutner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
W
2026-07-16 · RHutchins-CHCC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Niels Lameijer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-12 · CBaddour-CHCC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Keri A Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-07-04 · CBaddour-CHCC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Deborah Howard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-06-28 · CBaddour-CHCC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Trang Huynh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-13 · CBaddour-CHCC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Megan Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-06-07 · CBaddour-CHCC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Haley Kutner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
68%
17W–8L · 61.5% of games
4.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
87.5%
7W–1L · 72.8% of games
7.5
66.7%
10W–5L · 57.4% of games
4.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 74.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 59% of the time
#1 Doubles
59%
33 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams