← Search

Jamie Wasserman

East Brunswick, NJ
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
304 matches · 186W–118L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jamie Wasserman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history304 matches
W
2026-06-30 · Diff'rent Strokes · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Betsy Veysman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-24 · Mercer United · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Betsy Veysman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-23 · Diff'rent Strokes · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Betsy Veysman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-16 · Diff'rent Strokes · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lori Bennett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-06-12 · 2 Bucks & Beyond · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tanya Tomao
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-11 · Split Steppers Night · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Roxanna Choe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-3
W
2026-06-10 · Mercer United · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Betsy Veysman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-3
L
2026-06-09 · Diff'rent Strokes · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sue Pangis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-06-05 · 2 Bucks & Beyond · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-04 · Split Steppers Night · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Roxanna Choe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-06-02 · Diff'rent Strokes · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Betsy Veysman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
Timothy Smith / Yoojung Co
2026-05-31 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Neal Ruben mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
73.2%
30W–11L · 60.3% of games
3.5
65.8%
50W–26L · 59.4% of games
4.0
53.5%
61W–53L · 51.5% of games
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
50%
12W–12L · 53.3% of games
8.0mixed
60%
18W–12L · 51.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
158 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
71 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
62 matches
#1 Singles
3%
9 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert