← Search

Ron Shortenhaus

— year-end
48 matches · 18W–30L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Ron Shortenhaus to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history48 matches
L
2026-07-09 · Ditsworth: Valley Southwoods · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with David Brick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-25 · Ditsworth: Valley Southwoods · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brent Hanson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-22 · Heil · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Brick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-11-09 · Heil · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ronald Bradfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2025-09-28 · Heil · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Matthew Morgan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2025-09-14 · Heil · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joel Nikolas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-04-04 · Staiert & Baeth: Lifetime · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matthew Morgan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-03-07 · Shortenhaus/Pitzen · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Philip Pitzen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2025-02-22 · Staiert & Baeth: Lifetime · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ryan Staiert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2024-12-07 · Staiert & Versteeg · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brett Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L
2024-11-01 · Shortenhaus/Pitzen · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Philip Pitzen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2024-09-29 · Shortenhaus/Pitzen · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Philip Pitzen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
Teams22 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
60%
3W–2L · 51.1% of games
4.0
37.5%
9W–15L · 47% of games
8.0
31.6%
6W–13L · 46.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
12 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer