← Search

Ronald Bradfield

— year-end
106 matches · 55W–51L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Ronald Bradfield to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history106 matches
W
2026-04-19 · IA/Carlyle-Miller/65&Over8.0M · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joel Sissel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-22 · Heil · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Richard Heil
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-02-01 · Heil · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cliff Stroh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-01-17 · Versteeg: Genesis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brandon Willett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2025-12-14 · Heil · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Matthew Morgan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-11-09 · Heil · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ron Shortenhaus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2025-10-31 · Versteeg: Genesis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Richard Heil
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-09-28 · Heil · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Richard Heil
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2025-09-14 · Heil · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Matthew Morgan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2025-06-21 · IA/Pitzen/65&Over8.0M · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joel Sissel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2025-04-12 · Versteeg: Genesis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Richard Heil
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-03-07 · Shortenhaus/Pitzen · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Richard Heil
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
Teams50 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
26.5%
9W–25L · 41.9% of games
8.0
69%
20W–9L · 56.9% of games
7.0mixed
78.6%
11W–3L · 58.2% of games
8.0mixed
51.7%
15W–14L · 53.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 43% of the time
#2 Doubles
43%
46 matches
#1 Doubles
35%
37 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
21 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe