← Search

Mary Sutton

— year-end
94 matches · 29W–65L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Mary Sutton to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history94 matches
L
2026-09-09 · Price/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with WENDY Vines
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
Gina Smith / Lisa Buckner
2026-09-02 · Sutton/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Dana Ferry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-08-20 · Sutton/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Roz Wallace
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-08-12 · Price/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with WENDY Vines
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-09 · Sutton/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mary Umsted
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-2
L
2026-07-19 · Bienstock/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle McCarty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-12 · Bienstock/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carol Himmelstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-14 · Bienstock/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Monika Wierdl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-31 · Bienstock/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Monika Wierdl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
Debbie Churchey / Debbie Bryant
2026-05-17 · Bienstock/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barby Patterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-29 · Price/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Xiaoqun Akers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-04-26 · Drake/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Gambrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
Teams45 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
56.2%
9W–7L · 54.6% of games
3.5
28.1%
16W–41L · 39.5% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
20%
4W–16L · 36.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 42% of the time
#3 Doubles
42%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
34 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
20 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer