← Search

Micaela Cignetti

— year-end
121 matches · 38W–83L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Micaela Cignetti to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history121 matches
W
2026-08-25 · Eddy/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Pinky ArunPrakash
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
Emily Stolnicki / Blake Adams
2026-08-11 · Eddy/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cristi Ross
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-08-05 · Eddy/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tina Schneiderman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-07-25 · Schneiderman/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diego Hijano mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-23 · Campbell/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jill Campbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-07-21 · Eckelkamp/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Catherine Owen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-18 · Schneiderman/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diego Hijano mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 4-6
L
Donna Wolfanger / Mark Cooper
2026-06-22 · Schneiderman/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diego Hijano mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
Cheryl Body / David Jones
2026-06-20 · Schneiderman/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diego Hijano mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-06-18 · Campbell/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chelsea Jewell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-06-15 · Campbell/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Muhlbauer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-06-09 · Eckelkamp/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Muhlbauer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
Teams53 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
80%
4W–1L · 55.2% of games
3.0
45.5%
20W–24L · 48.5% of games
3.5
11.9%
5W–37L · 34.2% of games
5.5
40%
2W–3L · 51.9% of games
6.5
42.9%
6W–8L · 49.6% of games
3.5mixed
9.1%
1W–10L · 37.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
44 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
35 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
32 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
6 matches
#1 Singles
3%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal