← Search

Kimberly MacQueen

— year-end
55 matches · 27W–28L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Kimberly MacQueen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history55 matches
L
2026-05-31 · Bienstock/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrea Bienstock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-17 · Bienstock/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carol Himmelstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-05-07 · Trotz/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sheila Carro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-05-06 · Carlisle/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Haygood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
Michele Smith / Tammy Shassberger
2026-04-30 · Trotz/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie White
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
Terri Smith / Tiffany Knighton
2026-04-22 · Stockton/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicky Wander
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-15 · Carlisle/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Keras
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-04-08 · Stockton/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Huss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-03 · Carlisle/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eleanor Mascioli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-04-02 · Trotz/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Natalie Barrett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-03-31 · Trotz/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Harriet Dodd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-03-19 · Trotz/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Natalie Barrett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
Teams57 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
70.6%
24W–10L · 56.3% of games
4.0
18.8%
3W–13L · 32.9% of games
6.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
22 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
16 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova