← Search

Lynette Huber

— year-end
31 matches · 16W–15L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Lynette Huber to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history31 matches
W
2026-05-26 · Hempfield - Woods-Kelly · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Sisay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2025-11-12 · Hempfield - Woods Kelly · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Kaye Mede
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-10-30 · Hempfield - Woods Kelly · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Nancy ONeill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2025-10-22 · Hempfield - Woods Kelly · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Kaye Mede
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-09-19 · Hempfield - Woods Kelly · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Debra Myers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-09-15 · Hempfield - Woods Kelly · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Nancy ONeill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2025-07-24 · Hempfield - Woods-Kelly · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jane Barley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2025-06-17 · Hempfield - Woods-Kelly · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dori Keller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-06-10 · Hempfield - Woods-Kelly · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2025-06-05 · Hempfield - Woods-Kelly · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tomo Carson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2025-06-03 · Hempfield - Woods-Kelly · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erica Cavanaugh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-03-26 · Hempfield - Woods-Kelly · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Dorothy Love
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
Teams6 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
61.5%
8W–5L · 52.4% of games
3.0
40%
4W–6L · 40.7% of games
5.0
50%
4W–4L · 49.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 65% of the time
#1 Doubles
65%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
7 matches
#1 Singles
10%
3 matches
#3 Doubles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer