← Search

LISA GRIMES

— year-end
50 matches · 22W–28L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add LISA GRIMES to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history50 matches
W
2026-09-01 · Romanek · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marissa Romanek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-08-06 · Romanek · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Maier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-08 · 55NetChix · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Diana Heinze
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-04 · 55NetChix · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susan Maier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-05-02 · 55NetChix · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joan Ferrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-03-31 · The Vicious Vollies · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Maier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-03-09 · The Vicious Vollies · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Josephine Bakari
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-02-24 · The Vicious Vollies · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Maier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-01-28 · The Vicious Vollies · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Maier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
L
Shelley Williams / Audrey Gunther
2025-03-26 · The Vicious Vollies · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Maier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2025-01-15 · The Vicious Vollies · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joan Ferrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
Sandra Curtis / Brandie Sparr
2024-05-30 · Racquettes · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lynn Hoffman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
Teams30 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
37.5%
9W–15L · 44.8% of games
7.0
25%
1W–3L · 47.5% of games
7.5
50%
2W–2L · 60.3% of games
8.0
60%
3W–2L · 56% of games
0.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 48% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
13 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer