← Search

Elizabeth Jacobson

QUEENSTOWN, MD
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
278 matches · 129W–149L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Elizabeth Jacobson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history278 matches
L
2026-09-12 · Gunther/Williams · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Iliff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-30 · Gunther/Williams · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristen Petre
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-29 · Gunther/Williams · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gia Jang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-27 · Kelly/Jacobson · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael McGowan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-08-19 · Gunther/Williams · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Dawson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-15 · Gunther/Williams · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gia Jang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-08-09 · Gunther/Williams · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dale Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-07-28 · Slice Girls · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-27 · Kelly/Jacobson · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Scott A Green mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-26 · Slice Girls · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Teresa Russin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-07-25 · Slice Girls · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Coady
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-07-23 · Kelly/Jacobson · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Bernhard mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams93 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
3.0
44.4%
4W–5L · 47.9% of games
3.5
53.9%
62W–53L · 51.5% of games
4.0
23.5%
8W–26L · 39.1% of games
6.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
61.5%
8W–5L · 55.3% of games
7.0
54.8%
17W–14L · 51% of games
7.5
37.5%
6W–10L · 46.9% of games
8.0
16.7%
4W–20L · 39% of games
3.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 52.2% of games
6.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 51.5% of games
7.0mixed
70%
7W–3L · 58.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
108 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
92 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
62 matches
#2 Singles
3%
7 matches
#1 Singles
2%
5 matches
#3 Singles
1%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova