← Search

Timothy Sziraky

— year-end
59 matches · 32W–27L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Timothy Sziraky to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history59 matches
L
2026-06-18 · A55 7.0M SP Dezso · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Thomas Chi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-05-14 · A55 7.0M SP Dezso · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pete Goumas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
Michael Terapane / Robert Moore
2025-07-25 · A40 3.5M SP Derrig · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Thomas Chi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2025-07-18 · A40 3.5M SP Derrig · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Manuel Victoriano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2025-06-19 · A40 3.5M SP Derrig · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Philip Nagashima
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2025-06-12 · A40 3.5M SP Derrig · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Philip Nagashima
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2025-06-05 · A40 3.5M SP Derrig · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Derrig
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-06-02 · A55 7.0M SP Dezso · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pete Goumas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2025-05-29 · A40 3.5M SP Derrig · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Philip Nagashima
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2024-06-24 · OH NEO A40 3.5M Schulte · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wade Hurley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2024-06-10 · OH NEO A40 3.5M Schulte · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wade Hurley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2024-05-13 · OH NEO A40 3.5M Schulte · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wade Hurley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
Teams13 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
60%
27W–18L · 55.4% of games
7.0
50%
4W–4L · 47.6% of games
7.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 41.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 49% of the time
#2 Doubles
49%
29 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
12 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert