← Search

Leigh Washabaugh

Ann Arbor, MI
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
85 matches · 29W–56L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Leigh Washabaugh to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history85 matches
L
2026-08-31 · BARTON-Geer 6.5 Combo Mix · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Edward Washabaugh mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-05 · BARTON-Geer 6.5 Combo Mix · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Edward Washabaugh mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-03 · BARTON-Geer 6.5 Combo Mix · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Edward Washabaugh mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-23 · BARTON-Newton 55s 7.0 DW f1 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Newton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-15 · BARTON-Molloy 18s 3.5 NW F1 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Suzy Roebuck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-29 · BARTON- Geer 40s 3.5 NW F1 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rosa Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-17 · BARTON-Molloy 18s 3.5 NW F1 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alison Holcombe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-11 · BARTON-Newton 55s 7.0 DW f1 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alison Holcombe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-08 · BARTON- Geer 40s 3.5 NW F1 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alison Holcombe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-27 · BARTON-Molloy 18s 3.5 NW F1 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Terry Zdanowski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-11 · BARTON- Geer 40s 3.5 NW F1 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Suzy Roebuck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-07-10 · 3BART-GEER 35NW MO 40&O SEM F4 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lynn Kurtz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
0.0
75%
3W–1L · 63.4% of games
3.0
47.6%
10W–11L · 50.1% of games
3.5
27.1%
13W–35L · 39.3% of games
7.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
0%
0W–5L · 17.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
34%
29 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
15 matches
#4 Doubles
12%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer