← Search

Cindy Klebe

Muscatine, IA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
46 matches · 29W–17L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Cindy Klebe to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history46 matches
L
2026-01-18 · Yawalkar · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steven Nesteby mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-01-17 · Amelon & Anderson: HTRC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jane Haedt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-01-10 · Amelon & Anderson: HTRC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Teresa Suchomel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-01-03 · Amelon & Anderson: HTRC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ana Michelsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2025-12-06 · Amelon & Anderson: HTRC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jane Haedt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2025-11-22 · Amelon & Anderson: HTRC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin McKay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
Dominick Rath / Michelle Webster
2025-11-21 · Yawalkar · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Garrett Ellard mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-10-18 · Amelon & Anderson: HTRC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2025-10-04 · Amelon & Anderson: HTRC · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Trisha Welter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2025-04-19 · Amelon & Anderson: HTRC · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2025-01-18 · Amelon & Anderson: HTRC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2025-01-11 · IAWC/Amelon/Anderson/40&Over4.0W · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
76.5%
26W–8L · 59.6% of games
4.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 34.9% of games
8.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 47.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 44% of the time
#1 Singles
44%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
9%
4 matches
#2 Singles
7%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe