← Search

Brian Rohr

Iowa City, IA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
85 matches · 49W–36L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Brian Rohr to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history85 matches
L
2026-05-02 · Dery & Aluri: NDAC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Fred Radunzel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-04-25 · Sichterman: NDAC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brendan Oneill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-28 · Sichterman: NDAC · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-01 · Yawalkar · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Torgerson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-21 · Dery & Aluri: NDAC · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Dominick Rath
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-02-13 · Yawalkar · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Torgerson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-02-06 · Yawalkar · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rebecca Shive mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-01-25 · IA/Sichterman/55&Over8.0M · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Mulligan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-01-17 · IAWC/Sichterman/40&Over4.0M · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jim Sichterman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-01-03 · IAWC/Sichterman/40&Over4.0M · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Steckel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-12-07 · Steckel · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sarah Hinkhouse mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-11-15 · IAWC/Sichterman/40&Over4.0M · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brent Foss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
77.4%
24W–7L · 61.7% of games
4.5
22.2%
2W–7L · 40% of games
8.0
65.2%
15W–8L · 54.7% of games
8.0mixed
27.8%
5W–13L · 47.5% of games
9.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 66.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
30 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
24 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert