← Search

Hillary Johnson-Jahangir

Iowa City, IA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
71 matches · 36W–35L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Hillary Johnson-Jahangir to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history71 matches
W
2026-07-15 · Rath · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tiffany Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-07-08 · Rath · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alisa Steele
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-07 · Rath · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maleah Hampton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-24 · Rath · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tiffany Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-16 · Rath · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Novak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-06-03 · Rath · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Novak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-09 · Amelon & Anderson: HTRC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Wolf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
L
2026-04-26 · Rath · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Stierman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-25 · Amelon & Anderson: HTRC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Wolf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-18 · Amelon & Anderson: HTRC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Novak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-12 · Rath · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tyler Karrels mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Ann Brown / Kim Sherman
2026-03-07 · Amelon & Anderson: HTRC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Novak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
20%
1W–4L · 51.1% of games
3.0
40%
2W–3L · 43.7% of games
3.5
68.4%
13W–6L · 59.7% of games
4.0
38.5%
10W–16L · 40.6% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
8W–4L · 50.4% of games
8.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 44.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
16 matches
#2 Singles
6%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
4 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer