← Search

John Stierman

— year-end
60 matches · 23W–37L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add John Stierman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history60 matches
W
2026-05-17 · IA/Smith-Mahoski/65&Over7.0M · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kevin Nebergall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-05-03 · Smith/Butcher · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kevin Nebergall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-05-02 · Childers: Clinton · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with William Hughes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-04-26 · Rath · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Hillary Johnson-Jahangir mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-19 · Mahoski/Bryant · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with William Hughes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-03-29 · Rath · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Kemmerer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-03-14 · Childers: Clinton · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Victor Nop
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-02-22 · Smith/Butcher · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kevin Nebergall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-02-14 · Childers: Clinton · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Victor Nop
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-01-31 · Childers: Clinton · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Harmon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-01-25 · Smith/Butcher · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dave Ceurvorst
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-01-17 · Childers: River Cities · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joe Slavens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
Teams23 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
24.1%
7W–22L · 44.9% of games
7.0
100%
8W–0L · 63.6% of games
8.0
33.3%
7W–14L · 43.5% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 35% of the time
#3 Doubles
35%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
20 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
17 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer