← Search

Bradley Eisenberg

Wake Forest, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
112 matches · 65W–47L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Bradley Eisenberg to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history112 matches
W
2026-08-20 · Jo.Hoomani40C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jeff Abercrombie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-08-09 · Jo.Hoomani18C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Nevin Shrimanker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-08-06 · Jo.Hoomani40C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Stuart White
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-02 · Jo.Hoomani18C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jeff Abercrombie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-30 · Sh.Lav18T · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joshua Limon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-07-26 · Jo.Hoomani40T · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Scott Walton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-16 · Pa.Spell40M · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Eisenberg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-16 · Sh.Lav18T · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Scott Walton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-07-15 · Pa.Spell40M · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tara Spina mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-07-12 · Jo.Hoomani40T · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with John Hoomani
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-07-02 · Pa.Spell40M · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Donna Driscoll mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-06-25 · Pa.Spell40M · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Eisenberg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
64.6%
42W–23L · 54.9% of games
3.5
20%
2W–8L · 39.5% of games
6.5
55.6%
15W–12L · 52.2% of games
3.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 61.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
38 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
37 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
25 matches
#1 Singles
6%
7 matches
#2 Singles
5%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova