← Search

Jennifer Sauld

Ann Arbor, MI
4.0A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
170 matches · 118W–52L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jennifer Sauld to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history170 matches
L
Devynn Wojdyla / Mckenzie Walsh
2026-08-26 · CHIP-Sauld 8.5 COMBO MIX · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sean Howard mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-12 · CHIP-Sauld 8.5 COMBO MIX · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sean Howard mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-08-01 · #1 Doubles · with Anne-Marie Kim championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · with Christina Slade championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-10 · CHIP-Slade 18s 8.0X F · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Todd Schalk mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
Paula Recknagel / Rachel Gottlieb-Smith
2026-07-07 · LIB-Sauld 18s 4.0 NW F2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Slade
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-19 · CHIP-Slade 18s 8.0X F · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Eric Mitchell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-06-17 · VTC-Cooper (indoor) 40s 4.0 DW F · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Frances Carlson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-06-16 · LIB-Sauld 18s 4.0 NW F2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Slade
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-04 · LIB-Slade 40s 4.0 NW F1 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Slade
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-06-02 · LIB-Sauld 18s 4.0 NW F2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Slade
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
L
2026-05-27 · VTC-Cooper (indoor) 40s 4.0 DW F · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Mooney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams61 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
0.0
60%
3W–2L · 64.8% of games
4.0
76.1%
35W–11L · 62% of games
4.5
52.2%
12W–11L · 53.2% of games
7.5
100%
12W–0L · 67.3% of games
8.5
40%
2W–3L · 48.9% of games
9.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 78.7% of games
7.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 52.6% of games
8.0mixed
73.7%
14W–5L · 60.3% of games
8.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
72 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
58 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
36 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe