← Search

Frances Carlson

Ann Arbor, MI
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
255 matches · 173W–82L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Frances Carlson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history255 matches
W
2026-08-26 · LIB-Rosenwasser 7.5 COMBO MIX · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brad Rosenwasser mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-08-17 · LIB-Rosenwasser 7.5 COMBO MIX · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Justin Sweet mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-08-12 · CHIP-Sauld 8.5 COMBO MIX · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Chandler Daub mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-08-05 · LIB-Rosenwasser 7.5 COMBO MIX · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brad Rosenwasser mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-04 · CHIP-Slade 18s 8.0X F · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Eric Mitchell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-03 · CHIP-Sauld 8.5 COMBO MIX · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kevin Daly mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-01 · #2 Doubles · with Kerri-Ann Croftchik championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-31 · #2 Doubles · with Elissa Bayraktar championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-07-31 · #3 Doubles · with Elissa Bayraktar championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-25 · #3 Doubles · with Christine Lammers championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-17 · LIB-Marley 18s 7.0X F · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christopher Li mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-7
L
2026-07-15 · CHIP-Formicola 18s 4.5 NW F · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sarah Fahrbach
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams73 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
69.4%
25W–11L · 58.8% of games
4.0
63.6%
49W–28L · 53.8% of games
4.5
25%
2W–6L · 41.2% of games
7.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
80%
8W–2L · 60.4% of games
7.5mixed
72.7%
8W–3L · 57.7% of games
8.0mixed
80%
8W–2L · 55.9% of games
8.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
90 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
71 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
67 matches
#1 Singles
5%
12 matches
#2 Singles
3%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova