← Search

Aimee Gregg

Cordova, TN
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
42 matches · 17W–25L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Aimee Gregg to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history42 matches
W
2026-08-25 · Moore/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Dee Pitawanakwat
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
W
2026-08-23 · Moore/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Christen Lundgren
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-04-19 · Arbelaez/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Hala Hakim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
Ann Sneed / Emily Brown
2025-09-14 · Moore/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Dee Pitawanakwat
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2025-09-10 · Myrick/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Dee Pitawanakwat
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-1
W
2025-08-24 · Moore/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Hayley Hudson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-08-23 · Myrick/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Brooke Levy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
Suzanne Sexton / Elizabeth Lewis
2025-08-17 · Moore/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sarah Hervey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2025-08-10 · Moore/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Dee Pitawanakwat
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2025-08-09 · Myrick/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Dee Pitawanakwat
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-07-20 · Jackson/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matthew Gregg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-07-13 · Jackson/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matthew Gregg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams51 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.5
47.6%
10W–11L · 47.6% of games
8.5
46.2%
6W–7L · 47.9% of games
4.5mixed
14.3%
1W–6L · 36.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 38% of the time
#3 Doubles
38%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
10 matches
#1 Singles
7%
3 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova