← Search

Dee Pitawanakwat

Lakeland, TN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
108 matches · 70W–38L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Dee Pitawanakwat to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history108 matches
W
2026-09-13 · Schuler/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mary Ellen Mathews
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-09-01 · Goetsch/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Carly McWatters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-08-30 · Hayes/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Haley Carlson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-08-30 · Schuler/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lisa Burk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-08-27 · Hayes/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Haley Carlson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-08-25 · Goetsch/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Louisa Bowie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-25 · Moore/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Aimee Gregg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
W
2026-08-19 · Goetsch/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Louisa Bowie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-16 · Schuler/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lisa Burk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-26 · Hayes/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joe Johnson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-20 · Hayes/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristy Pelt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-07-19 · Hayes/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Dacus mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams91 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
76.9%
30W–9L · 62.1% of games
4.5
43.5%
10W–13L · 47.1% of games
7.5
90%
9W–1L · 59.8% of games
8.5
53.3%
16W–14L · 50.6% of games
4.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 57.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
35 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
32 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams