← Search

Joanna Sykes

Brandon, MS
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
101 matches · 47W–54L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Joanna Sykes to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history101 matches
L
Whitney Mays / Christina Johnson
2026-09-03 · Sykes, Joanna · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Audrey Page
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-1
W
2026-09-02 · Sims, Ginny · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kate Feldman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-20 · Sykes, Joanna · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Polly Moon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-19 · Sims, Ginny · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amy Sherman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-08-05 · Sims, Ginny · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Polly Moon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-08 · Lee, Jenny · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lance Miller mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-07-06 · Donaldson, Missy · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nealie Cooper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-30 · Lee, Jenny · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacey Sykes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-23 · Lee, Jenny · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Zachary McIntyre mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-26 · Lee, Jenny · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacey Sykes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-05-18 · Donaldson, Missy · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Nealie Cooper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-03-19 · Trigg, Anita · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emma Pullen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams49 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 57.4% of games
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
41.2%
14W–20L · 50.4% of games
4.0
15.4%
2W–11L · 34.7% of games
6.5
63.6%
21W–12L · 53.1% of games
7.5
0%
0W–4L · 27.9% of games
3.5mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 54.2% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
45 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
22 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova