← Search

Whitney Mays

— year-end
74 matches · 51W–23L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Whitney Mays to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history74 matches
W
2026-09-03 · Webb, Jill · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Christina Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-1
L
Lauren Ingram / Amanda Carter
2026-08-20 · Webb, Jill · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lavonne Sims
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
W
2026-06-29 · Sims, Lavonne · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Beverly Mann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-05-18 · Sims, Lavonne · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Beverly Mann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-05-11 · Sims, Lavonne · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Beth Noland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
W
Jennifer Moore / Catherine Stoltzfus
2026-05-04 · Sims, Lavonne · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Rawson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-04-16 · Ruhl, Allison · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sage Conner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-04-10 · Ruhl, Allison · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beverly Mann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-03-26 · Ruhl, Allison · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allison Ruhl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-03-19 · Ruhl, Allison · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beverly Mann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-05 · Ruhl, Allison · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beverly Mann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-02 · Ruhl, Allison · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
Teams27 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
85.7%
12W–2L · 66.1% of games
3.0
88.2%
15W–2L · 67.1% of games
3.5
50%
8W–8L · 49.2% of games
5.5
88.9%
8W–1L · 67.5% of games
6.5
44.4%
8W–10L · 48.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 55% of the time
#1 Doubles
55%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
7 matches
#2 Singles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams