← Search

Kim Reed

— year-end
57 matches · 27W–30L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Kim Reed to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history57 matches
L
2026-09-08 · Martin · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Fabiola Custodio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-09 · Baldwin · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marina Anglim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-28 · Baldwin · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sadie Simpson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-27 · Stellar Strikers 40+ · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sadie Simpson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-07-16 · Baldwin · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erin McVeigh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-07-15 · Stellar Strikers 40+ · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Yuscavage
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-25 · Baldwin · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lorra Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-20 · Baldwin · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Baldwin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-06-14 · Stellar Strikers 40+ · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sadie Simpson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-18 · Baldwin · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Nesti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-05-14 · Stellar Strikers · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sadie Simpson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-13 · Baldwin · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ann Harrison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
Teams21 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
100%
10W–0L · 64.4% of games
3.5
37.9%
11W–18L · 47.3% of games
4.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 37% of games
6.5
75%
3W–1L · 63.2% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
15 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal