← Search

AYESHA CURE

Springfield, OH
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
231 matches · 146W–85L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add AYESHA CURE to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history231 matches
L
2026-08-23 · STC-Enslen · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jessica Westfall
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-16 · STC-Enslen · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Tammy Kessler
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-12 · STC-Enslen · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Nicola Murphy
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-14 · STC-Enslen · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Tammy Kessler
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-25 · QRRC-McNea-Wiley · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Audrey Vanhoose
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-19 · QRRC-McNea-Wiley · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kristin Taphorn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-12 · KTC-Stevens · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Frank BUDDY Pitts Jr mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-14 · QRRC-McNea-Wiley · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amanda Ooten
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-02-08 · KTC-Stevens · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Frank BUDDY Pitts Jr mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 1-6
L
Paige Harsman
2026-01-31 · QRRC-McNea-Wiley · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-01-11 · QRRC Whiting · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Monica Standley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
Monica Hawkins / Susan Smith
2025-12-07 · QRRC Whiting · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sherri Zahorian
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams71 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
77.3%
17W–5L · 68.6% of games
4.0
70%
63W–27L · 58.2% of games
4.5
34.8%
8W–15L · 41.7% of games
7.5
69.2%
9W–4L · 55.2% of games
8.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 44.8% of games
7.0mixed
75.8%
25W–8L · 60.5% of games
8.0mixed
40%
14W–21L · 48% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
83 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
63 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
40 matches
#2 Singles
10%
23 matches
#1 Singles
10%
22 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova