← Search

Joshua Peters

— year-end
187 matches · 85W–102L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Joshua Peters to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history187 matches
W
2026-07-20 · Riff Raff · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Geoffrey Miguel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-15 · Easier to Run · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dave Baggenstoss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4
L
2026-07-12 · Easier to Run · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Will Coston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-24 · Easier to Run · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Edgar Cala
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-19 · Easier to Run · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kishore Chandrasekharan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-17 · Easier to Run · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Will Coston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-10 · Easier to Run · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Richard Liu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-06-08 · Riff Raff · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bruce Joo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-04-11 · Sandbaggers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jason Pesaro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-28 · Sandbaggers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Craig Allen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-02-28 · Sandbaggers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Craig Allen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-02-21 · Sandbaggers · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jim Serrano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
Teams40 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
66.7%
46W–23L · 53.4% of games
4.0
23.1%
12W–40L · 41.9% of games
7.5
54.5%
6W–5L · 49% of games
6.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
53.3%
16W–14L · 52.8% of games
7.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 47.5% of games
8.0mixed
0%
0W–12L · 33.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 30% of the time
#2 Doubles
30%
56 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
52 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
49 matches
#1 Singles
12%
22 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer