← Search

Michael McNees

LOTHIAN, MD
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
62 matches · 19W–43L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Michael McNees to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history62 matches
L
2026-09-11 · Appel · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Yulin Henry mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-02 · Appel · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Beth Flaherty mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-08-03 · Perotti · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Douglass Lamartin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-29 · Toro · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with William Davenport
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-27 · Feldtmose/Appel · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kenneth Lay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
N/A
2026-07-25 · Feldtmose/Appel · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Appel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-24 · Toro · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with William Davenport
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-13 · Feldtmose/Appel · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Appel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-07-12 · Feldtmose/Appel · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Uche Aginam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
L
2026-07-08 · Feldtmose/Appel · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kenneth Lay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-26 · Toro · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with William Davenport
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-25 · Perotti · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jose Toro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
29.4%
5W–12L · 39.3% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0
27.3%
3W–8L · 44.7% of games
7.0
20%
1W–4L · 41.6% of games
8.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
27.3%
3W–8L · 37.8% of games
7.0mixed
25%
3W–9L · 43.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
37%
23 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
14 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams