← Search

Diedre Wooden

Cherry Hills Village, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
145 matches · 80W–65L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Diedre Wooden to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history145 matches
L
2026-07-14 · GCC RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rebecca Potts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-23 · GCC RED · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Manley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-18 · GCC TEAL · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Steelman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-11 · GCC TEAL · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rebecca Potts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-09 · GCC RED · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rebecca Potts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-26 · GCC BLUE · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Manley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
W
2026-05-22 · GCC BLUE · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kris McMullan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-6
L
2026-05-19 · GCC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kris McMullan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-05-07 · GCC TEAL · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rebecca Potts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-02 · GCC BLUE · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Manley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-04-28 · GCC BLUE · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kris McMullan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
2025-08-02 · #3 Doubles · with Rebecca Potts championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
0.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 45.8% of games
3.5
83.3%
15W–3L · 60.4% of games
4.0
50.5%
49W–48L · 51.5% of games
7.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 50.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
52 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
36 matches
#1 Singles
16%
23 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
19 matches
#1 Female Singles
6%
8 matches
#2 Singles
5%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova