← Search

Jill Barghelame

LITTLETON, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
173 matches · 90W–83L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jill Barghelame to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history173 matches
L
2026-07-14 · CACM BLUE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Diana Rael
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-07-07 · CACM BLUE · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-07-05 · CACM RED · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nick Schroer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-30 · CACM BLUE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Smita Merchant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-21 · CACM RED · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nick Schroer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-06-06 · #2 Doubles · with Craig Stromberg championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-17 · CACM GREEN · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dirk McDermott mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-05-14 · CACM GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kit Demko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-05-12 · CACM GREEN · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cynthia Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-05-07 · CACM GREEN · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kara Boulanger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-05-05 · CACM GREEN · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nancy Hallowell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-04-28 · CACM GREEN · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cynthia Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
53.1%
68W–60L · 51.8% of games
7.5mixed
22.2%
2W–7L · 45.1% of games
8.0mixed
57.1%
16W–12L · 50.7% of games
8.5mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 51.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
80 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
54 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
20 matches
#1 Singles
7%
12 matches
#2 Singles
4%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is a perfect combination of violent action taking place in an atmosphere of total tranquillity.
Billie Jean King