← Search

Becca Schmidt

Cherry Hills Village, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
73 matches · 28W–45L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Becca Schmidt to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history73 matches
L
2026-06-22 · CHCC RED · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Angie Sanders
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-06-18 · CHCC RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Pavlakis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-09 · CHCC RED · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
Sarah Plagenza / Elodie de Fabrique
2026-06-04 · CHCC RED · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Foulkes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-05-30 · CHCC RED · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wendy Croney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-22 · CHCC RED · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wendy Croney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-7
L
2026-05-21 · CHCC RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Foulkes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-12 · CHCC RED · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wendy Croney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-21 · CHCC RED · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Margaret Berzins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-08-14 · CHCC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wendy Croney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2025-08-05 · CHCC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wendy Croney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
2025-07-15 · CHCC RED · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Pavlakis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
61.9%
13W–8L · 55.1% of games
3.5
54.2%
13W–11L · 53.4% of games
4.0
7.7%
2W–24L · 37% of games
8.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
23 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal