← Search

Doug Biske

Ann Arbor, MI
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
62 matches · 29W–33L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Doug Biske to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history62 matches
W
2026-08-11 · LIB-Arthur 18s 8.0X F · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Elissa Bayraktar mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-07-31 · LIB-Arthur 18s 8.0X F · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Amy Storey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
W
Robert Gray / Mitchell Dickey
2026-07-21 · LIB-St Pierre 18s 4.0M F2 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Szymanski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-07-14 · LIB-St Pierre 18s 4.0M F2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hunter St Pierre
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
Nicholas Antony / Elizabeth Chiquelin
2026-07-10 · LIB-Arthur 18s 8.0X F · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Molly Lipham mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-30 · LIB-St Pierre 18s 4.0M F2 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Theriot
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-25 · LIB-Briceno 40s 4.0M F1 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Theriot
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-06-23 · LIB-St Pierre 18s 4.0M F2 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Szymanski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-29 · LIB-Arthur 18s 8.0X F · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Elizabeth Mosher mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-26 · LIB-St Pierre 18s 4.0M F2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Szymanski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-05-17 · LIB-St Pierre 18s 4.0M F2 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Szymanski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-15 · LIB-Briceno 40s 4.0M F1 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Szymanski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
35.7%
10W–18L · 45.8% of games
7.5
36.4%
4W–7L · 49.2% of games
8.0
100%
5W–0L · 73.2% of games
8.0mixed
64.3%
9W–5L · 51.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
11 matches
#1 Male Doubles
7%
4 matches
#2 Singles
7%
4 matches
#1 Male Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova