← Search

Al Pick

Durham, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
135 matches · 75W–60L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Al Pick to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history135 matches
L
2026-08-22 · JLundberg-DUR · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Stewart Bible
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-08 · JLundberg-DUR · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Joshua Lundberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-01 · JLundberg-DUR · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Joshua Lundberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-29 · BGooch-DUR · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lynda Noga mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-16 · BGooch-DUR · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hannah Silverstein mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-06-29 · JLundberg-DUR · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-06-28 · JLundberg-DUR · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-26 · MHanauer.5.0T-DUR · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joshua Lundberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-06-24 · JLundberg-DUR · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-18 · BGooch-DUR · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hannah Silverstein mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-17 · JLundberg-DUR · #3 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-15 · JLundberg-DUR · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
100%
8W–0L · 69.1% of games
4.0
66.2%
43W–22L · 59.1% of games
4.5
29.6%
8W–19L · 44.6% of games
7.5
46.2%
6W–7L · 51.1% of games
8.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 50.3% of games
4.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 47.9% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 51.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 29% of the time
#1 Doubles
29%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
27 matches
#1 Singles
15%
20 matches
#2 Singles
13%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
17 matches
#3 Singles
11%
15 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal