← Search

Jill Salstrand

Raleigh, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
148 matches · 71W–77L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jill Salstrand to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history148 matches
W
2026-08-21 · Pe.LeGaux65C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mary Tulenko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-19 · Je.Wolborsky40C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Evelyn Andino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-08-13 · We.Sielaty55C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sharon Fadelici
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-08-06 · We.Sielaty55C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sharon Fadelici
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-05 · Je.Wolborsky40C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mary Strothmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-31 · Pe.LeGaux65C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mary Strothmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-07-30 · We.Sielaty55C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Linda Chabinsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L
Jessica Jones / Lauren Daigle
2026-05-05 · Je.Wolborsky40A3.0 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Strothmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-27 · We.Sielaty55A3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Evelyn Andino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-21 · Je.Wolborsky40A3.0 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marie Gelston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-04-14 · Je.Wolborsky40A3.0 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Wolborsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-03-31 · Pe.LeGaux65A · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Strothmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
57%
45W–34L · 52.6% of games
3.5
7.7%
1W–12L · 36.9% of games
5.5
45.5%
5W–6L · 51% of games
6.5
48.4%
15W–16L · 48.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
51 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
40 matches
#1 Singles
5%
7 matches
#2 Singles
3%
5 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams