← Search

Hope Graney

Raleigh, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
283 matches · 169W–114L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Hope Graney to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history283 matches
L
2026-08-26 · Ch.Burr40C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Camille Conzola
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-25 · TOC.Hollett · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Julie Liddle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-21 · EBlack-DUR · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Christine Burr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-08-12 · Ch.Burr40C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Terry Perrone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-11 · TOC.Hollett · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Shelly Jude
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-31 · EBlack-DUR · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Julie Karg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-30 · Ca.Conzola55C6.5 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Camille Conzola
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-06-25 · Ca.Conzola55T · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Myra Peterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
Laura Caldwell / Beth Johnson
2026-06-22 · Ca.Conzola55T · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julie Liddle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
Donna Johnson / Julie Long
2026-06-20 · #2 Doubles · with Jacqueline Morgan championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-20 · #4 Doubles · with Debbie Castiller championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-19 · #4 Doubles · with Susan Cokas championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams62 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
68%
68W–32L · 57.2% of games
3.5
48.2%
27W–29L · 47.8% of games
5.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 59.5% of games
6.5
58.8%
50W–35L · 54.9% of games
3.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 60.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 41% of the time
#3 Doubles
41%
115 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
100 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
60 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
5 matches
#3 Singles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova