← Search

Ivanna Stewart

Kingsport, TN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
67 matches · 40W–27L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Ivanna Stewart to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history67 matches
L
2026-09-09 · Blackburn/META · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Gail Archer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-09-03 · Blackburn/META · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Gail Archer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
Ellan Kitzmiller / Savanna Summers
2026-09-02 · Stewart/META · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mia Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-08-28 · Stewart/META · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dusty Blackburn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-08-18 · Stewart/META · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary DiSantis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
Lynn Johnson / Emily Caveney
2026-08-09 · Stewart/META · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mary DiSantis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-08 · Thacker-Hinkle/META · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dusty Blackburn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-01 · Thacker-Hinkle/META · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dusty Blackburn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-07-29 · Thacker-Hinkle/META · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Taihi Egres
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-28 · Stewart/META · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Taihi Egres
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-07-21 · Stewart/META · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dusty Blackburn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-07-19 · Stewart/META · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Taihi Egres
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams52 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
58.3%
21W–15L · 54.2% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
50%
6W–6L · 52.1% of games
8.5
40%
2W–3L · 48.2% of games
4.0mixed
84.6%
11W–2L · 61.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
25 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
13 matches
#1 Singles
18%
12 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova