← Search

Jacquelyn Wondergem

Johnson City, TN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
28 matches · 11W–17L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Jacquelyn Wondergem to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history28 matches
L
2026-08-01 · Betancourt/META · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Liz Guillemette
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-30 · Betancourt/META · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Liz Guillemette
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-29 · Betancourt/META · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Liz Guillemette
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-26 · Betancourt/META · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Ewing
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-04-26 · Thacker-Zhang/META · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Fogg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
Connie Simcox / Julie Duncan
2026-04-14 · Thacker-Zhang/META · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Fogg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-03-24 · Thacker-Zhang/META · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alice Zhang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
Analida Alexay / Connie Simcox
2026-03-22 · Thacker-Zhang/META · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kylie Wade
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-15 · Thacker-Zhang/META · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Fogg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
W
2025-09-23 · Hagood/META · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Alice Zhang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 0-6, 1-0
L
2025-09-16 · Hagood/META · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Liz Guillemette
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-05-04 · Zhang/META · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Analida Alexay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
42.1%
8W–11L · 44.2% of games
7.5
50%
2W–2L · 46.4% of games
4.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
14%
4 matches
#1 Singles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams