← Search

Annette Clemons

Jonesborough, TN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
29 matches · 16W–13L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Annette Clemons to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history29 matches
W
2026-09-09 · Blackburn/META · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mary DiSantis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-08-23 · Hagood6.5/META · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Makie Kordamiri
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-08-20 · Betancourt/META · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Fogg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-08-18 · Stewart/META · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Keith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-08-13 · Betancourt/META · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Theresa Boyd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-09 · Stewart/META · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Keith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-08 · Betancourt/META · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Analida Alexay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-07-21 · Stewart/META · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Keith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-19 · Stewart/META · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Keith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-04-15 · Sentell/META · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marcia Sentell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-04-12 · Hagood3.5/META · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joan Hagood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-04-08 · Sentell/META · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Scherping
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
64.3%
9W–5L · 59.5% of games
4.0
50%
4W–4L · 51.4% of games
6.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
50%
2W–2L · 46.8% of games
8.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
38%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe