← Search

Mandy Yasinski

— year-end
155 matches · 85W–70L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Mandy Yasinski to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history155 matches
L
2026-09-11 · Genesis Saw Mill Health Club 4.0 Fall · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bridget Alaimo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-05 · SOL:Mixology:Rose/Guzzetti · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pankaj Jha mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-30 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Graham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-29 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Schwartz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-22 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ali Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ali Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
Elyse Poole / Kim Kaplan
2026-06-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Schwartz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
Medea Elvy / Kristen Hoft
2026-06-03 · Cole Dream Aces · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Lowitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4
L
Tori Bender / Nicole Schneider
2026-06-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alissa Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
Hillary Portnoy / Helene Ginsburg
2026-05-27 · Cole Dream Aces · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Schwartz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7
W
Brooke Rosner / Samantha Shinnick
2026-05-18 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Schwartz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-6
L
2026-05-12 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rebecca Dickson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
Teams41 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
53.8%
14W–12L · 50% of games
3.5
60%
36W–24L · 51.6% of games
4.0
28.6%
6W–15L · 36.4% of games
7.0mixed
63.6%
21W–12L · 54.8% of games
8.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 58.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
70 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
45 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
30 matches
#1 Singles
6%
9 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe