← Search

Jamie Gagne

Centennial, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
133 matches · 79W–54L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jamie Gagne to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history133 matches
W
2026-07-23 · WC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-07-16 · WC RED · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Seidlitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-09 · WC RED · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Burt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-4
L
2026-07-02 · WC RED · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacy Masur
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
L
2026-06-25 · WC RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dana Sandberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-18 · WC RED · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-11 · WC RED · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Burt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-28 · WC GREEN · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacy Masur
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-21 · WC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Seidlitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-05-16 · WC GREEN · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-14 · WC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dana Sandberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-23 · WC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Seidlitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
88.9%
16W–2L · 73.2% of games
3.0
69.2%
36W–16L · 55.4% of games
3.5
33.3%
13W–26L · 42.3% of games
6.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 41.3% of games
7.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 29% of the time
#2 Doubles
29%
38 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
36 matches
#1 Singles
26%
35 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
17 matches
#2 Singles
5%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert