← Search

Christine Kim

Ann Arbor, MI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
117 matches · 66W–51L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Christine Kim to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history117 matches
W
2026-06-25 · LIB-Slade 40s 4.0 NW F1 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Slade
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-18 · LIB-Slade 40s 4.0 NW F1 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Slade
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-11 · LIB-Slade 40s 4.0 NW F1 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Slade
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-07 · CHIP-Sauld Tri MED Women F · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susi Shaw
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-02-15 · CHIP-Sauld Tri MED Women F · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Colleen Hughes
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-12-07 · 1LIB-Sauld 75 WOMEN COMBO F3 · #3 Doubles · with Christie Dickinson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
Amy Kaufman / Inge Miller
2025-10-05 · 1LIB-Sauld 75 WOMEN COMBO F3 · #3 Doubles · with Kerri-Ann Croftchik
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-08-20 · 2LIB-LEVASSEUR WOMEN LOW 40 35 30 AUG TRI SEM F1 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ruth Le
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-08-06 · 2LIB-LEVASSEUR WOMEN LOW 40 35 30 AUG TRI SEM F1 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dee Lamphear
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-06-18 · 4LIB-MARLEY 35NW WE 18&O SEM F4 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Thu Kehn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-05-29 · 3LIB-SLADE 40NW TH 40&O SEM F1 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Mooney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2025-03-01 · 4LIB-SAULD win tri 45 40 35 W SEM F2 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chelsea Doyle
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
44.8%
30W–37L · 50.8% of games
4.0
77.8%
7W–2L · 56.3% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 62.5% of games
8.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 33% of the time
#3 Doubles
33%
38 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
34 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
21 matches
#1 Singles
6%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
7 matches
#2 Singles
5%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is a perfect combination of violent action taking place in an atmosphere of total tranquillity.
Billie Jean King