← Search

Danielle Smith-Elliott

West Bloomfield, MI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
77 matches · 43W–34L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Danielle Smith-Elliott to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history77 matches
W
2026-08-19 · EAST-KEAN 7.5 COMBO MIX · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brian Kean mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-17 · EAST-KEAN 7.5 COMBO MIX · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Michael Varner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
Lori Green / Jalynn Schnr
2026-08-07 · #2 Doubles · with Grace Kurec Shahnazary championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-31 · #1 Doubles · with Jaimie Provagna championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-24 · FAC-Stieber 18s 7.0X F · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Avinash Hosanagar mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-07-21 · FAC-Diamond 55s 7.0 NW F3 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marie Enright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-09 · FAC-Steiner 40s 4.0 NW F3 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-07 · FAC- Jam 18s 4.0 NW F3 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nisha Jam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
Akiko Uno / Shingi Hirano
2026-06-26 · FAC-Stieber 18s 7.0X F · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Krystian Lagowski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-06-23 · FAC-Diamond 55s 7.0 NW F3 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rayna Handelman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-06-19 · FAC-Stieber 18s 7.0X F · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brad Stieber mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-12 · FAC-Stieber 18s 7.0X F · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brad Stieber mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 54.2% of games
4.0
39.1%
9W–14L · 41.9% of games
7.0
76.9%
10W–3L · 63.2% of games
7.5
100%
4W–0L · 65.3% of games
8.5
60%
3W–2L · 52.1% of games
7.0mixed
52.6%
10W–9L · 52.2% of games
7.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
25 matches
#1 Singles
29%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
12%
9 matches
#2 Singles
4%
3 matches
#3 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe