← Search

Elyse Poole

Chappaqua, NY
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
133 matches · 68W–65L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Elyse Poole to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history133 matches
L
2026-09-11 · ClubFit Briarcliff Firecrackers 18+ 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maggie Engles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-6
W
2026-07-29 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Victoria Shobe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-13 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Catherine Hammond
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-22 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Toby Amidor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Kaplan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-02 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Catherine Hammond
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-27 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Kaplan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
Samantha Shinnick / Brooke Rosner
2026-05-26 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Bell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
Nicole Schneider / Tori Bender
2026-05-18 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Denise Wenacur
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Kaplan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-4
L
2026-02-28 · CRRC: Highly Strung · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paul Poole mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-10-18 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paul Poole mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
84.2%
16W–3L · 65.4% of games
3.5
47.1%
48W–54L · 49% of games
4.0
0%
0W–5L · 34.9% of games
7.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 40.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
62 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
19 matches
#1 Singles
13%
17 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova