← Search

Julie Lowitz

— year-end
124 matches · 67W–57L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Julie Lowitz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history124 matches
L
2026-07-14 · #3 Doubles · with Valerie Jacobs championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-13 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Schwartz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-07-08 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Valerie Jacobs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-30 · CRRC Early Birds 55+ 7.0W · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elayne Peretz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-16 · CRRC Early Birds 55+ 7.0W · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marielise Watts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-06-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Valerie Jacobs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
Yuling An / Tracy Ji
2026-06-10 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-06-02 · CRRC Early Birds 55+ 7.0W · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marielise Watts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-05-31 · 4S:Beauty, Brains and Bubbly: Rose/Schultz · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marielise Watts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-28 · CRRC Early Birds 55+ 7.0W · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robin Schultz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-05-27 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robin Schultz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-6
W
2026-05-13 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-2
Teams29 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
73.1%
19W–7L · 59.6% of games
3.5
52.1%
38W–35L · 49.1% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
58.3%
7W–5L · 49.6% of games
8.0mixed
30%
3W–7L · 44% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
54 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
38 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
29 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert