← Search

Vincent Conzola

Raleigh, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
338 matches · 205W–133L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Vincent Conzola to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history338 matches
L
2026-08-23 · Ti.Koves18C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Chris Mauro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-08-09 · Ti.Koves18C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Aaron Heil
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-08-07 · Ca.Conzola40M · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Camille Conzola mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-03 · Mi.Elstob55S · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-31 · Ca.Conzola40M · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Camille Conzola mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-30 · Ti.Koves18T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Timothy Koves
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-28 · Da.Swann55T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Ferris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-07-22 · Ca.Conzola55M · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Johnson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-18 · Ca.Conzola40M · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Fultz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-14 · Ca.Conzola40M · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vanese Clough mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-13 · Mi.Elstob55S · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-07-09 · Ti.Koves18T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mike Elstob
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams63 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
60%
3W–2L · 56.1% of games
3.5
65.3%
113W–60L · 56.4% of games
4.0
33.3%
4W–8L · 43% of games
6.5
81.8%
9W–2L · 61.9% of games
7.5
58.6%
34W–24L · 54.9% of games
3.5mixed
63.6%
14W–8L · 56.3% of games
7.0mixed
50%
13W–13L · 52.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
118 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
95 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
55 matches
#1 Singles
10%
33 matches
#2 Singles
7%
22 matches
#3 Singles
4%
15 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert