← Search

Lorri Ahl

— year-end
187 matches · 104W–83L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Lorri Ahl to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history187 matches
W
2026-04-29 · Gundell/Seelig · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Elizete Groenendaal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-03-29 · Volley Llamas · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sally McKenzie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-5
L
2026-03-02 · Gundell/Seelig · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sandra Borrelle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-03-01 · Volley Llamas · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Harrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-02-25 · Volley Llamas · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lesley Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-03 · Gundell/Seelig · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lesley Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-02-01 · NC:Sets In The City:Gallagher/Rose · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jill Guzzetti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-01-29 · Gundell/Seelig · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lesley Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
N/A
2026-01-27 · Volley Llamas · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Harrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-01-24 · Bernstein · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Higgins mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-01-22 · Gundell/Seelig · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jane Groveman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-12-07 · Bernstein · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Warren Chan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
Teams46 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
2.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
67.5%
56W–27L · 60.7% of games
3.5
51.1%
24W–23L · 48.8% of games
7.0
22.2%
2W–7L · 37.7% of games
6.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
40%
8W–12L · 46.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
61 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
59 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
58 matches
#1 Singles
3%
5 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova