← Search

David Peters

Raleigh, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
120 matches · 44W–76L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add David Peters to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history120 matches
L
2026-08-26 · La.Leins40C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ian Campbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-23 · Co.Sutler18C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jonathan Drum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-19 · La.Leins40C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ian Campbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-12 · La.Leins40C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tim Lyon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-08-03 · To.Sutler18M · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Holly Moore mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-07-27 · To.Sutler18M · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Holly Moore mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-26 · Sc.Cruikshank40T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tyler Priest
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-19 · Sa.Rhoades40M · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rochelle Grieco mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-17 · Sa.Rhoades40M · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Hughes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-28 · Sa.Rhoades40M · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Holly Moore mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-06-22 · To.Sutler18M · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Camden Clark mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-06-15 · Sc.Cruikshank40T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Cruikshank
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
32.4%
11W–23L · 46.3% of games
4.5
60%
12W–8L · 55.7% of games
7.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 46.6% of games
8.5
28%
7W–18L · 46.3% of games
4.0mixed
61.1%
11W–7L · 48.3% of games
4.5mixed
0%
0W–6L · 26.3% of games
9.0mixed
10%
1W–9L · 30.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
49 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
33 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer